| May 13, 2009 |
Questions over eBay's New Fakes Policy |
| By: Ina Steiner |
| Wed May 13 2009 013:49:10 |
eBay is requiring that buyers destroy items they believe are non-authentic according to the new eBay Purchase Protection Policy, as reported in today's AuctionBytes Newsflash newsletter. But many questions remain over just how eBay will implement the policy and how it will protect sellers from unscrupulous or misinformed buyers.
For instance, under what circumstances would eBay instruct a buyer to destroy an item? (and how would eBay know if the item was authentic or not?)
Are there cases where eBay would instruct a buyer to destroy an item without having it authenticated?
Does this provision apply to all sellers? Or will eBay have agreements with certain trusted sellers so it is understood those sellers would not be subjected to this particular provision?
A doll-seller on eBay's discussion board raised another point - how will eBay define "authentic":
Authentic is not even defined! Does this apply only to fakes and reproductions? Or does "authentic" come into issue any time there is a dispute between the seller and buyer regarding the doll? If a seller sells a china doll as a "covered-wagon hairstyle" and the buyer claims it was instead a "flat top," does that mean the doll is not authentic?
Since eBay needs to train its customer service representatives on exactly how to implement the policy, it should have answers to these questions that can be readily shared with sellers, who are increasingly being forced to bear more risk in selling on eBay.
|
Reading AuctionBytes Blog: Questions over eBay's New Fakes Policy |
|
Comments (83) | Leave Comment | Permalink
|